The War for Talent Has Become the War for Personal Branding

Alan Herrity  | August 21, 2025

Back in 1997, McKinsey coined the phrase 'The War for Talent'. That war hasn’t gone away—however, it has evolved. In today’s digital world dominated by smartphones, platforms like LinkedIn, and an endless stream of content. With many of the candidates I represent, it increasingly feels like we’re in a war for personal branding.

It’s a shift I’ve been observing for some time. As an Executive Search consultant, I spend a lot of time helping people with their CVs, LinkedIn profiles, and career development. What I see consistently is this: whilst applying for roles is technically easier than ever, standing out in a meaningful, credible way is much harder.

Why Personal Branding Matters

Applying for a job today can take just a few clicks. However, that speed has made the process noisier and more impersonal. Your digital presence has become more than just a supplement to your CV—in many cases, it’s your first impression, your perceived reputation, and your career narrative all in one.

For instance, I often work with technology and transformation leaders—CTOs, CIOs, and COOs—who are driving high-impact digital initiatives. Yet many struggle to stay visible outside their organisations. Internally, their contributions are substantial; externally, their presence is almost invisible. Some leaders feel that the “Personal Branding” on LinkedIn and other platforms is not authentic, and they want their work to speak for itself. However, I do feel that this shift is of increasing importance, and you need to embrace it in some way. 

Three Branding Styles I See in the Market

In my experience, professionals tend to fall into three groups:

  • The naturals of personal branding: They share insightful content, highlight team achievements, and show how they think and lead. It feels authentic and aligned with what they actually do in the workplace.
  • The well-intentioned but misaligned: They post regularly, but their content doesn’t reflect their work or strengths. There’s a gap between what they do and what they show. LinkedIn is awash with personal branding, my industry included, where many of the posts really do not align to a work purpose.
  • The traditionalists: Some leaders prefer more personal, direct ways of connecting. They’d much rather have a good phone conversation or a coffee—an opportunity to share their skills, experience, and leadership style through genuine, one-on-one conversations. I do feel that you need to be able to do a bit of both these days. I often witness situations where senior leaders and Executives have neglected their networks and personal brands because they have been rightly focusing on the job at hand. 

I’ve met brilliant candidates who didn’t have a well-written CV or a personal brand who are exceptional. Equally, I’ve also seen impressive-looking CVs and personal brands that didn’t hold up under scrutiny. Branding isn’t the full story, it has become an important piece of the puzzle.

Finding the Right Balance

One risk I often see, especially on LinkedIn, is the temptation to overshare personal content. It’s easy to drift away from your professional narrative or dilute your message. I suggest aiming for an 80/20 balance: 80% professional, 20% personal.

That 80% should highlight your work outcomes, leadership insights, industry trends, and team successes. The remaining 20% can be more human—a personal anecdote, a family milestone, or something meaningful. That balance helps you show up as a well-rounded person and a credible professional.

When your personal brand becomes disconnected from your work brand, it is likely to weaken your message about who you are and what value you bring. 

Building Your Brand Without Burning Out

This is the area that busy senior Managers and Executives often struggle with. My view is that you don’t need to post every day. And you don’t need to reinvent yourself.

Here’s what I recommend:

  • Start small and be consistent. One or two posts a week is a great start. I personally use a calendar reminder to help me stay on track.
  • Share industry articles and add your perspective. This is an easy way to demonstrate thought leadership. This is what really sparks my interest in you.
  • Celebrate your team’s wins. Leadership isn’t just about personal success—it’s about elevating others.
  • Keep your LinkedIn profile up to date. Think of LinkedIn as your real-time professional portfolio.
  • Stay connected offline too. Attend events. Keep in touch with executive search consultants. Schedule catch-ups even when you’re not actively looking for work. 

We recently shared a short video on this topic: Transformation Leaders: Don't Let Your Network Go Cold — available now on our YouTube Channel.

I’m not trying to be an influencer or a personal branding expert —my aim is to assist the reader to be consistent, professional, and insightful to their networks. 

What About Those Who Dislike Self-Promotion?

If you’re someone who doesn’t like the idea of “self-promotion”, you’re not alone. Some of the best leaders I work with feel the same.

But branding isn’t bragging. It’s storytelling. It’s about making sure your story doesn’t get lost and you promote yourself for the right reasons. 

Even if all you do is post once a fortnight with an insight or reflection, you’re making your presence felt. And when opportunities arise, you are more likely to be on a future company’s or search firm’s radar. 

Final Thoughts

When I work with clients on retained executive searches, we assess every candidate against clear criteria. We don’t choose people based on who posts the most. 

Ultimately, your brand should reflect who you really are—not just buzzwords. Focus on leadership behaviours, problem-solving ability, and how others experience working with you.

Alan Herrity

Director

Momentum Search and Selection

By Alan Herrity November 25, 2025
A conversation with an executive recently reframed something many boards are still grappling with. The real blind spot in boardrooms isn’t just a lack of technical understanding. It’s the confidence to interpret technology investments through a strategic lens — how they enable the business, improve risk, and ultimately strengthen customer experience. If a board sees a $50 million cloud program purely as IT infrastructure, the conversation is already heading in the wrong direction. The strategic case for technology is, in effect, the case for digital transformation. That means understanding how the change reshapes process performance, customer visibility, and operational resilience. As that executive put it, a true digital transformation “exposes your process performance to your customers.” It’s a useful test: if your customers could see exactly how your processes work, would they still choose you? That’s the difference between technology as cost and technology as capability. Technology Fluency Isn’t About Technical Depth Boards don’t need more technologists. They need directors who can recognise what technology enables — growth, speed, resilience, and transparency. That has always been the requirement. The gap today is that these decisions now sit at the centre of strategy rather than the periphery. Digitally fluent boards Link investment to strategy, not infrastructure Differentiate between modernisation and transformation Understand customer impact as clearly as cost impact Assess risk in operational, cultural, and technology terms Where boards struggle is usually not with the technology itself, but with context. They miss how decisions play out culturally — the hidden signals in execution that determine whether a transformation will land. As one executive in my network put it, “the distance between the board and where the work happens means cultural signals get lost.” His view is right; culture remains one of the quietest destroyers of transformation success. The Strategic Value of Technology Leaders on Boards This is where experienced Technology Executives add real value. However, not as technical custodians. The strongest candidates position themselves as enablers of strategy, stewards of risk, and commercial contributors who can translate complexity into clarity. They can articulate why a transformation matters, how it links to the operating model, and what the organisation needs to do to ensure customers feel the benefit. They don’t talk about platforms first; they talk about outcomes. The best ones move comfortably between strategy, execution and culture. They can explain the positive impact on the P&L in ways that resonate with non-technical colleagues. That’s what differentiates a board-ready technology leader from one who’s simply senior in their function. Boards Need to Close Their Own Blind Spots Technology Executives bring essential perspective, but the responsibility doesn’t sit with them alone. Boards need to identify where their blind spots are — whether that’s digital capability, data literacy, transformation oversight, or cultural interpretation — and close them. A digitally fluent board isn’t one with a single expert. It’s one in which the full group can challenge assumptions, interrogate investment cases, and understand how transformation affects customers, risk, and strategy. When they do lead a major transformation, the job isn’t finished when the program ends. The most effective boards review, assess, and learn. Continuous change means there’s no moment for relief. If a board feels the work is “done”, that’s usually the signal that it’s time to evolve again. What This Means for Technology Executives Preparing for Board Roles For leaders aiming to step into governance roles, the expectation has shifted. Position yourself as someone who: Enables strategy, rather than represents a function Understands risk in operational and technology terms Can show a clear link between transformation and commercial outcomes Brings the cultural awareness to read execution signals early Boards don’t need technologists. They need technology-literate strategists with the experience to make change investable and the judgement to ensure it succeeds. Closing the Gap Business models, customer expectations, and technology capability will continue to move at pace. The organisations that thrive will be those whose boards understand how technology shapes value — not as a technical discipline, but as a strategic one. For many boards, that shift is still underway. For Technology Executives, it’s a clear opening to contribute where the business needs clarity most. If both sides step towards each other, the blind spot closes.  Please contact Alan Herrity to explore this topic further.
By Alan Herrity November 11, 2025
The Quiet Crossroads Every Transformation Leader Reaches You’ve been offered a lateral move. You might feel that it’s a step back. Your mentor says take it. You’re torn. That tension — perceived progress versus pragmatism — is one I see often. Recently, a CIO I know asked me about the pros and cons of a sideways step. On paper, it can look like a setback. In reality, it can set the stage for the next big leap. “Careers aren’t ladders anymore. They’re landscapes - and the best leaders learn to navigate them". Four Real Ways Careers Move Forward Careers rarely move in straight lines. In truth, there are four ways to grow — each valid in its own season.
By Alan Herrity November 10, 2025
Case Study - General Manager - IT Project Services
By Alan Herrity November 10, 2025
Case Study - General Manager, Transformation & Enterprise Project Management Office (EPMO)
By Alan Herrity November 10, 2025
Case Study - Head of Transformation
By Shazamme System User October 24, 2025
Case Study - Program Director – Confidential Initiative
Two businessmen discussing ideas with light bulbs symbolizing innovation and strategy
By Alan Herrity August 21, 2025
Recently, I had lunch with a Senior Transformation Executive who'd been a candidate in a Momentum Search and Selection-led search late last year. While he didn’t land that particular role, we stayed in touch and often discussed different opportunities. Today, he’s thriving in a new opportunity — and he credited some of our conversations as a key part of his journey.
Program Director coding cyber security on multiple screens in modern workspace
By Alan Herrity August 8, 2025
Securing Leadership for a Multi-Year Cyber Uplift.
By Alan Herrity August 4, 2025
Why the briefing meeting is the most under-leveraged step in hiring — and what top-performing organisations do differently.
Professional viewing Momentum Search hiring solutions for regulatory programs
By Alan Herrity July 14, 2025
Since the 2018 findings of Australia’s Royal Commission into misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation, and Financial Services Industries, regulatory reform has continued to accelerate.